|
Islamophobia In The American Left: A Book Report (Pt. 2 of 2)
... As a fair-skinned Arab Christian and not incidentally a professor of English, Salaita has a level of social invisibility and access that often grants him a front row seat to the peculiarities of white liberal rhetoric. He writes with grim wit of attending a faculty function for "distinguished" (read: rich) alumni which was - with the notable exception of himself, a single African American colleague who left quickly, and a four person catering staff - wholly white. As the evening progressed a conversation about Evangelical preacher Jerry Falwell culminated with the suggestion, heartily seconded by laughing liberals, that the best way to neutralize the conservative pundit would be if he were discovered in a hotel room "with a black boy". In other words, for the white liberals who wished to end Falwell's career, on balance the sexual molestation of a child of color seemed an acceptable price to pay. This logic depends on an "understanding of the theoretical boy as not quite human, but doubly objectified, first by a predatory fantasy Falwell and second by the cocktail-sipping liberals willing to use him to silence the infamous preacher."
Salaita succeeds brilliantly at deconstructing the hypocrisy of such scenes, making clear that liberal politics are no guarantor of empathy. He writes, "Most white liberals have a remarkably difficult time identifying with the subjects of their sympathy". Salaita argues this difficulty is "especially acute when the subjects are Arabs or Muslims, whose lived experiences are so often disregarded in favor of racist caricature". However, to insist that Arabs and Muslims are more complex than their barbarous stereotype suggests is to become "uncultured" in Salaita's terms, a victim of white liberal sanctimony. And the key difference between neoconservative anti-Arab and Muslim hatred and its liberal parallel is that the former is openly hateful, while the latter maintains "a compassionate pose while reinforcing damaging stereotypes." In one of the most affecting essays in this collection, "I was called up to commit genocide," Salaita affirms his identity as a Palestinian Christian to disrupt the claim to authority of Christian Zionists who cite biblical justification for the ethnic cleansing of Palestine. However, he is conscious "of the trap inherent in using Christian identity to advocate for Palestine, namely the risk of further defamiliarizing the majority of Arab Muslim voices in the West". If the impression of legitimacy that Arab Christians convey in the West is based on familiarity, "then that is not the same thing as actual legitimacy", especially when it depends on the continued suppression of Muslim voices. "This conundrum, in which the simple act of describing oneself in religious and/or cultural terms becomes complicated because of the powerful perceptions of those outside the community, is a quintessentially Middle Eastern problem". Salaita writes, "with Arabs this problem is acute because we exist in political colloquy as characters, never narrators ... [But] we too deserve the courtesy of telling our own cultural and historical stories"
The Uncultured Wars is a worthy contribution to a tradition of works by Arab American essayists, a distinguished company that includes Joseph Massad, Elmaz Abinder, Diana Abu-Jaber, Edward Said and others. Its theme is timely, as the shift to the left that swept Obama into office has rendered less tangible benefits than were originally hoped for. "The Obama Administration has resisted calls to prosecute the members of the previous administration for war crimes, backpedalled on closing Guantanamo Bay and instead proposed its own system of "preventive detentions," escalated war in Afghanistan and, of course, remains as blindly committed to Israel as George W. Bush ever was." In other words, in material terms the overwhelming victory of American liberalism has not effected much change for Arab and Muslim Americans. "While it is too early to make any definitive judgments about this presidency it is clear that situating Arab and Muslim American concerns between the right and left does not offer the clear-cut results one might assume". With this book, Steven Salaita offers a corrective and a warning about the capacity of white liberal altruism "to victimize, especially when its intent is to affirm the superiority of its own worldview." (Thanks to Joseph Shahadi - for inspiration)
|
Welcome!
Change Location:
Auburn and the Foresthill Bridge are both on the Amgen Tour of California map.
Route …
Denny's free Grand Slam breakfast offer was attracting a crowd today at …
The owners of a Loomis guide dog for the blind are searching for their …
Plans for a 155,000-square-foot building that could house a Costco, …
|
"... the overwhelming victory of American liberalism ...."
Liberalism has not won in America.
If Obama had run openly on his true agenda, he would have lost. This despite the horrible choice Republicans gave us.
The United States is a conservative nation with a lot of political power on the left. Both parties are led by their left wings, but they must make promises to their right wings to get elected. Americans do not want or like big government, but big government keeps giving them liberals to run against each other.
When was the last time a true conservative Republican was elected president? Ronald Reagan. Bush claimed to be a conservative (a compaaaaaasssionate conservative) and won because the Democrats put up their most liberal players (Gore, Kerry).
A true conservative (small government, states rights, lower taxes, national defense) would easily win. Unfortunately, neither party has one.
I'm going to be gone most of the day at Del Oro. We've got a Republican, a Democrat, a Libertarian, and a Green all meeting to speak to the seniors, get them registered to vote and answer questions. I was asked by the Peace and Freedom Party do speak on their behalf but I declined due to my dislike of partisan politics. Then, a week or so later, the Greens called me up... (sigh) so I agreed. I know, I know... I'm a hypocrite.
See you guys this afternoon/evening.
Next week... Placer.
It is refreshing to hear a voice that keeps both sides in check. No partisan us vs them garbage. Thanks for the post, Birch :-)
Birch
Interesting concept. Please post on it when you can.
Ron Paul was a PERFECT Republican, however the Right Wing Zionist Christian Evangelical Fanatics did not like him, because he does not support the war crimes and genocide of the Israeli Army and the infamous evil forces of the IDF (Israeli Defense Force). We keep catching these Israeli spies in the USA that are harming our country. Ron Paul would have been the best choice, but because he does not bend over and take it up the arse from Israel...he was not chosen.
CA04_Voter
I suggested the same thing to him this morning. The young adults of today are our leaders of tomorrow. I am extremely impressed with the maturity level, conscientious thinking and behavior of so many of them. Birch is a wonderful oral communicator and someone who "gets" them. I expect him to come home today with positive comments. I decided to give him space today at Del Oro and will join him next week at Placer High (my old alma mater) :-)
ThePatriot - High Five to you! Let's hope that the "Right Wing Zionist Christian Evangelical Fanatics" don't get ahold of the new software the CIA just purchased that allows them to better moniter our blogging sites. If they decide we are anti-zionists, anti-terrorism, we could find ourselves in Guantanimo Bay without an attorney.
So, Birch, this is your guy?
From a comment by Gabe, an alumnus of Virginia Tech, where Salaita is a professor.
“Virginia Tech has just hired an English professor (2007) that openly promotes jihad and the extermination of Israel: Steven Salaita.. . . In the Recent Faculty Publications in "A Feast of Words," I found this book promoted: Anti-Arab Racism in the USA: Where it Comes From and What it Means for Politics Today: Steven Salaita (Pluto Press, 2006). Here is the description in "A Feast of Words":
"Steven Salaita blends personal narrative, theory and polemics to show how deep-rooted Anti-Arab racism in America affects everything from legislation to cultural life, shining a light on the consequences of Anti-Arab racism both at home and abroad." The premise is definitely from Pluto: America is a racist country where peaceful Muslim Arab-Americans are the victims of violence and hatred, not the perpetrators, and that this supposed racism at home fuels jihad against America. Therefore, when we are attacked like on September 11, we deserve it because we are racists.”
How edifying.
We, the United States, under the Reagan administration, did more to help Osama Bin Laden come into power, than probably anyone else. Now, we must try to deal with it. No one, who truely loves Peace, the kind of people that truely love and follow God, condones violence as anything but a last resort. However difficult it is for us, we must face Truth, not just truth that supports our own hatred and selfishness...
we can't make real change until we want truth, no matter how painful that is.
Got to love those jihadists.
Observer: That is too simplistic.
Osama Bin Laden came to power because oil is literally oozing out of the ground in the Middle East. Oil is energy, energy is the lifeblood of technologically advanced societies, and thus a 4th century, pre-reformation religion was doused with more money than imaginable.
Because of their pre-reformation state of existence, they have kings and serfs in the 21st century.
Where you have kings, serfs, and money washing around, you have people who want to overthrow the king and are willing to commit horrendous atrocities to achieve their goals.
The fundamental problem is that Islam has not yet reformed. If they did, and if the money and power was behind a reformed Islam, people like Bin Laden would have no power base.
jihad is the "killing" of those smug, hateful, arrogant, unholy, self-justifying, selfish parts of us that must die, in order to see God. It was never intended to be acted upon, literally, (killing of another) as does any radical extremeists, whether they be Muslim, Christian, Jewish, etc...
I don't say this for your benefit, Lant, because it is clear who you are. You constantly try to paint an ugly picture about those things that many do not understand. It is called "bearing false witness"
Yosemite - We have good bargains with Saudi Arabia where oil is concerned, atleast to my understanding.They don't like Bin Laden either and they humiliated him by rejecting him. Bin Laden hates the US, perhaps more because he spreads his propaganda to people who are vulnerable to his narrow view. He was deemed as unimportant and he seems to need a place to find some type of validation. He recruits those without knowledge, much like people here who are easily lead others through lack of knowledge. Bin Laden does not practice Islam ("Peace") even though he professes to. It is much like people who claim to be Christian and do not practice it. I do not see much difference from the two for they both indoctrinate the same hatred and send others to do their dirty work.
Observer - are you advocating that I try to paint a beautiful picture of a cesspool? I have to paint what I see and I do not see how I can make a cesspool anything but ugly. Salaita promotes murder.
On the other hand, when I am not looking at a murder-advocating jihadist, I spend most of my time trying to paint an accurate, and I think beautiful, picture of Jesus, His Gospel, and the only way to eternal life. When I try to get you and others to focus on the truth, it is out of concern for your eternal destiny. My witness of Christ is true and Spirit driven, based on His revelation of Who He is, rather than emotional and based on my attempt to create some god of my own imagination.
I invite anyone who reads this to visit salaita.com and see for themselves what Steven is doing.
I would say that he does the work of Christ (a Palestinian Jew) for he comes to defend those who are innocent against a fearful, self-righteous and racially charged mob, not unlike those who He came to save, but instead, nailed Him to the Cross. In the wake of 9/11, American Muslims have suffered many wrongs by those who, in a state of ignorance and fear, are mislead by those who refer to good people, who love this country, who have and continue to contribute much good to our society,...as a "cesspool." Zionism is at the heart of this way of thinking and I think Steven speaks for real Jews also, when he says "Israel is ethnically cleansing Palestinians. There is nothing tolerable about ethnic cleansing; it is a deeply violent process."
Jesus was a Palestinian Jew? Don't think so my revisionist friend. Jesus was born in Bethlehem in the Roman province of Judea. Joseph and Mary lived in Nazareth in the Roman province of Galilee. The name "Palestine" (or any variant) was not to be found on the maps of that day. Palestine did not exist at that time.
Does Salaita advocate the extermination of Israel?
According to Encyclopedia Brittanica: "Palestine in Jesus’ day was part of the Roman Empire, which controlled its various territories in a number of ways. In the East (eastern Asia Minor, Syria, Palestine, and Egypt), territories were governed either by kings who were “friends and allies” of Rome (often called “client” kings or, more disparagingly, “puppet” kings) or by governors supported by a Roman army. When Jesus was born, all of Jewish Palestine, as well as some of the neighbouring Gentile areas, was ruled by Rome’s able “friend and ally” Herod the Great"
There are Christians in the Middle East, descended from the "originals" , still practicing a very holy type of Christian life, living in harmony with Muslims and Jews alike. Americana looks nothing like these ancient peoples and therefore would find it difficult to even recognise them...
Observer, do encourage Birch to share his experience at Del Oro. It's nice to see a spectrum of political beliefs being shared as I feel that is what represents the American people best.
How I wish Congress had such a variety! It would definitely require them to compromise and legislate from common ground not just party of power stances.
I haven't had time to day to get through Birch's latest postings but maybe later. It's a wild day at our home.
Patriot: I liked Ron Paul... sadly, I think he was too much of a conservative for the Republican agenda. :)
CA04_Voter: If you're talking about the thing and Del Oro today... it went well. I'll try and do a post on it tonight.
I'm beat... the kids were relentless. All in all I held my own, but "I wasn't expecting some kind of Spanish Inquisition...." Whew! I came home and slept for an hour and a half. The highlight? Eating lunch in the cafeteria... they had more fun doing it than I can remember.
Observer - You are correct. Ancient Palestine was an area that today includes Israel and the Palestinian territories, part of Jordan and parts of Lebanon and Syria.
Ancient Egyptian texts called the region "Djahy," which shared approximately the same boundaries as ancient Canaan or modern-day Israel and the Palestinian territories, and included modern Syria.
The name Palestine comes from the Greek "Palaistine." The Greeks probably got it from the Assyrians, who called it "Palashtu." It appeared on ancient Roman maps as Iudaea (from 63 BCE to 132 CE) or Syria Palaestina.
Jesus, who spoke Aramaic, a semitic language, was a Semitic Hebrew. Hebrews share ethnic and genetic traits and physical characteristics with Gulf Arabs, Ethiopian Arabs and North African Arabs. Recent DNA studies have confirmed that non-European Israeli Jews and Palestinians are the one and the same people, descended from a population that has lived in the area since prehistoric times.
Dag nabit, Skeptic! Don't go gittin' all scientific on us. We like makkin' up history ourselves n' don't need you confusin' us with the facts. Sheesh!
Observer, Skeptic, and Birch. Do I have to do all your homework? Your timelines and context are faulty as usual. But keep patting yourselves on the back.
About 61 B.C., Roman troops under Pompei invaded Judea and sacked Jerusalem in support of King Herod. Judea had become a client state of Rome. Initially it was ruled by the client Herodian dynasty. The land was divided into districts of Judea, Galilee, Peraea and a small trans-Jordanian section, each of which eventually came under direct Roman control. The Romans called the large central area of the land, which included Jerusalem, Judea. Jesus Christ was born in Bethlehem, Judea, in the early years of Roman rule. Roman rulers put down Jewish revolts in about A.D. 70, (decades after the birth and crucifixion of Jesus) and A.D. 132. In A.D. 135, the Romans drove the Jews out of Jerusalem, following the failed Bar Kochba revolt. The Romans named the area Palaestina, at about this time.
When is "this time?" 135 A.D.
Skeptic: We're available to coffee anytime today. The plans we had fell through.... so let me know. I'm sending you an email saying the same... that, or I'll just call you in a bit.
slapstick - it is no secret that Jews and Arabs share DNA through their common ancestor, Abraham. Nothing you have posted indicates that Israel was called Palestine, or anything similar, prior to 132 or 135 A.D., despite the foolishness exhibited by your sidekick.
slapstick, observer and birch - from your friends at Wikipedia: "The name "Palestine" is the cognate of an ancient word meaning "Philistines" or "Land of the Philistines". The earliest known mention is thought to be in Ancient Egyptian texts of the temple at Medinet Habu which record a people called the P-r-s-t (conventionally Peleset) among the Sea Peoples who invaded Egypt in Ramesses III's reign. The Hebrew name Peleshet (???????? P??léshseth)- usually translated as Philistia in English, is used in the Bible to denote the southern coastal region that was inhabited by the Philistines to the west of the ancient Kingdom of Judah. The Assyrian emperor Sargon II called the same region Palashtu or Pilistu in his Annals. In the 5th century BCE, Herodotus wrote in Ancient Greek of a 'district of Syria, called Palaistinê" (whence Palaestina, whence Palestine). According to Moshe Sharon, Palaestina was commonly used to refer to the coastal region, and shortly thereafter, the whole of the area inland to the west of the Jordan River. The latter extension occurred when the Roman authorities, following the suppression of the Bar Kokhba rebellion in the 2nd century CE, renamed "Provincia Judea" (Iudaea Province; originally derived from the name "Judah") to "Syria Palaestina" (Syria Palaestina), in order to complete the dissociation with Judaea."
Is that enough to convince you that Jesus was not a palestinian Jew?
Birch - do you ever get embarrassed over your antics?